If the prelim’s is to be compared with one day match, mains could be described as test match. The temperament and technique to play it is different than prelims.
Prelim is mainly factual study, many times without knowing how or why. On the other hand main’s is analytical study, knowing the essence of the story.
With introduction of variety in marking like 15,20,25 marks questions, instead of regular 60 marks, you are suppose to know the essence of many more stories.
Who can take history?
Student from any discipline can choose and master this subject with systematic efforts. Apart from that it enables candidate to write their essay paper with a historical perspective.
History is the only subject that can be lived. It is full of plots and counter plots, desires and detachments, kaleidoscope of shifting locations. Studying history is as good as sitting into time machine and visiting our ‘wonderful’ past. But all this is true only if you are ‘interested’ in the subject. Without interest, proper understanding of the subject can’t be developed. In that case history will seem like subject with vast syllabus, full of unrelated events and mere description of dead past. But interest either natural or created will make your past talk with you. Indeed in the words of E.H.Carr “history is a continuous dialogue between past and present”
As it is rightly said that, ‘history is not a study of facts, but interpretation of facts’. Facts are just raw material with which interpretation is done. Answers in the main’s are about your interpretation of History. The angle of focus on history has constantly shifted. From Political to Cultural to Economic to now subaltern.
Candidates are exempted if facts go wrong, but analysis is correct, but other way round will not do. Unlike other humanities subject, history does not have a theory part, all the 4 part’s i.e. Ancient, Medieval, Modern and World are applied.
With only one optional retained now in mains, history becomes more attractive since it’s a tried and tested subject, which is fairly stable in marks and launches candidates in the orbit of success regularly.
How much scoring history is?
History is one of the most popular option is U.P.S.C. examination for obvious reasons. It has synergy with General studies. In prelim history occupies frontline (16 (Ant-9, Med-1, Mod-6) questions out of 100 in prelim 2013) In mains its important component in GS paper I 140 marks questions of history and culture get covered by optional history (As per mains 2013G.S. paper) With GS for mains expanded considerably now, importance of history has gone up in new syllabus, from culture of India to world history to post independence developments. Now those who are going to have history as optional subject will get natural advantage and edge over others.
It is also useful in writing essay. (In new format marks for essay have gone up from 200 to 250) Since at least one socio-cultural issues comes as a topic, historic vision gives depth to the arguments. (for e.g. related to History, “Be the change you want to see in others (Gandhi)” is asked in mains 2013) History is highly subjective subject. Suppose the question was given ‘Evaluate the Gandhi’, then all candidates will write different answers. Which of them is right or wrong? None. It depends on how arguments are pushed. This makes the subject safe. Generally it is not possible that you don’t know anything about the answer. Ultimately you fetch some minimum marks in each question. That way no body goes below 180 in history.
But going by same logic history also does not give very high marks. There is nothing called perfect answer. Because of this phenomenon marks do not go above 300. But then to get into IAS one need to get 45-50% marks in the subject and that makes this subject an attractive proposition.
History is scoring subject. One of my student Sonal Sonkavde made a fortune with 396 markes. Shrikesh B. Lathkar who scored 365 in history in 2010 mains in his second attempt to get the 57th rank says, "History (365) has done it for me sir. Biggest thanks to you."
History is the scientific subject and can be studied scientifically. It is as scientific as physics or mathematics, only since it is from humanities side, things are open ended.
Resource material
The compulsory map question should be solved first and prepared first. Twenty sites are given & you have to mark them all on the given map and describe its importance in four lines. In 2012 & 2013 mains the question was turned inside out, sites are already pointed in the given map, a hint is given about the era to which the site belong, and then candidates have to identify and describe the site. (for e.g. Site related to a famous Indian philosopher, historical rock cut caves etc) For tackling it, you can in the end make a list of sites according to era like Vedic sites, Megalithic sites etc. By daily practice this question can turn into scoring one.
Sites from Ancient and medieval India are asked. Especially focus is now a day shifted to chalcolithic, megalithic sites, which are recently excavated. Spectrum has published the book about Ancient Indian places. The website of Indian Archeological department www.asi.nic.in is also useful for updating recent excavations.
To get understanding of Ancient India one can start from small book Outline of Ancient India by D.N.Zha. For medieval India Satishchandra who wrote in two volumes is a good choice.
In paper II world history is to be targeted. On modern India now so much research is available that there is no end of interpretation. Comparatively world history is straight and neutral. There are controversies in France about how the fall of Napoleon took place, but there are no such controversies in India. As it is, if world history questions are difficult you can switch to modern India at the last moment but reverse is not true. For e.g. most strait questions in 2013 mains are asked on world history part. World History is also most compact of the four parts.
Modern India could be covered from A Look at Modern Indian History by Grower & Grower, for post independence developments ‘India since Independence’ by Bipinchandra can serve the purpose.
IGNOU books will be useful, since most of the syllabus is taken directly from them. Brilliant Tutorials has published the material on mains history which is time saving since presented according to the syllabus.
Some internet sites are rich in content and photography in history For e.g. www.indhistory.com, www.historywiz.com/India.htm Wikipedia can prove a magic wand for getting answers.
Publication division has done grand job of publishing material which prove very helpful for the mains. They are
1) India – Art & Architecture in Ancient & Medieval Period
2) India – Early History
3) India – Government & Economic life in Ancient and Medieval periods
For World History good work is done by Jain & Mathur. It has covered our syllabus topic wise, but it is also true that it is not edited properly. Krishna Reddy has written book named ‘Modern World’ overcomes this issue. It has avoided the bulkiness and is updated with recent changes in syllabus. World History by L.Mukherjee is lucid and will make answers readable. It can be used as complementary with Jain & Mathur or Krishna Reddy.
Tracking syllabus is a fruitful exercise, for mains. The vast syllabus cannot be covered without the pointers. What is interesting is that syllabus of mains is clearly defined and examiners largely remain stick to it. (For e.g. in 2013 mains question were asked word to word from syllabus, Evaluate the ownership of land in ancient India (15) Evaluate the condition of industries in India from 1200 to 1500 CE (20) “The European Union is the new sick man of Europe.”(25)
Ancient India
Topic | Sub-topic | Brief Description | 15 M | 20 M | 30 Marks | 60 Marks |
1 | Sources | |||||
i) | Archeological sources | 2013 | 2003 | |||
ii) | Exploration, excavation, epigraphy, numismatics, monuments | 2011 | 2007/09 | |||
2 | Pre-history and Proto-history | 2013 | 2010 | |||
3 | Indus Valley Civilization | 2013 | 2012 | 2002 | ||
4 | Megalithic Cultures | 2011 | 2012 | 2008 | ||
5 | Aryans and Vedic Period | 2013 | 2009/10/11 | 2004 | ||
6 | Period of Mahajanapadas | |||||
i) | Economic growth; Introduction of coinage | 2003/11 | ||||
ii) | Spread of Jainism and Buddhism | 2011 | 2007 | |||
iii) | Rise of Magadha and Nandas | 2001 | ||||
7 | Mauryan Empire | |||||
i) | Polity, Administration | 2012 | 2005 | |||
ii) | Religion; Spread of religion; Literature | 2004 | ||||
8 | Post - Mauryan Period | 2013 | 2010/12 | 2008 | ||
9 | Early State & Soc in Eastern, Deccan and South India | 2010 | 2008 | |||
10 | Guptas, Vakatakas and Vardhanas | |||||
i) | Polity and administration, Economy | 2013 | 2009 | 2006/05 | ||
ii) | Indian feudalism, Caste system, Position of women | 2013 | 2013 | 2005/07/10 | ||
iii) | Education and educational institutions | 2013 | 2012 | 2003 | ||
11 | Regional States during Gupta Era | |||||
i) | Chalukyas of Badami | |||||
ii) | Palas, Senas, Rashtrakutas | 2012 | ||||
12 | Themes in Early Indian Cultural History | |||||
i) | major stages in the evolution of art and architecture | 2011 | 2004/09 | |||
ii) | ideas in Science and Mathematics | 2001 |
Medieval India
Topic | Brief Description | 10M | 12M | 15M | 20 Marks | 30 Marks | 60 Marks |
13 | Early Medieval India, 750-1200 | ||||||
The Cholas: administration, village economy and society | 2009/11/12 | 2004/07 | |||||
“Indian Feudalism” | 2005/09 | 2010/12 | 2011 | ||||
14 | Cultural Traditions in India, 750-1200 | ||||||
Philosophy: Skankaracharya and Vedanta | 2001 | 2008 | |||||
Growth of Bhakti | 2002 | 2010 | |||||
Sufism | 2003 | ||||||
Kalhan’s Rajtarangini | 2012 | 2003 | 2009 | ||||
Alberuni’s India | 2007 | 2003 | |||||
15 | The Thirteenth Century | 2013 | |||||
Consolidation: The rule of Iltutmish and Balban | 2004/08/11 | 2009/12 | |||||
16 | The Fourteenth Century | 2012 | |||||
“The Khalji Revolution” | 2006/11 | ||||||
Alauddin Khalji | 2001 | ||||||
Muhammad Tughluq | 2003/04/09 | ||||||
17 | Society, Culture in the 13th&14th Centuries | 2013 | 2010/11 | 2012 | |||
Sufi movement | 2013 | 2006 | |||||
Economy | 2013 | 2013/13 | 2009/10 | ||||
18 | The 15th & Early 16th Century – Political Developments and Economy | 2013 | 2013 | ||||
Mughal Empire, First phase: Babur and Humayun | 2001 | 2010 | |||||
The Sur Empire: Sher Shah’s administration | 2012 | 2006 | |||||
Bhakti and Sufi Movements | 2012 | 2005 |
2001/03/04 /05/07 |
||||
Portuguese Colonial Enterprise | 2008 | ||||||
19 | The 15th & Early 16th Century – Society and Culture | 2013 | |||||
Literary traditions | 2002/10 | ||||||
20 | Akbar | ||||||
Establishment of Jagir and Mansab systems | 2002 | 2011 | |||||
Rajput policy | 2013 | 2003/07 | |||||
Evolution of religious and social outlook | 2013 | 2004/06/09 | 2002 | ||||
21 | Mughal Empire in the Seventeenth Century | ||||||
Major administrative policies of Jahangir, Shahjahan and Aurangzeb | 2004 | ||||||
Religious policies of Jahangir, Shahjahan and Aurangzeb | 2006/13 | 2009 | |||||
Ahom Kingdom | 2008 | ||||||
22 | Economy and Society in the 16th & 17th Centuries | ||||||
Agriculture & craft | 2010 | 2008 | |||||
Towns, commerce with Europe | 2013 | 2012 | 2009/10 | 2006 | |||
Indian mercantile classes, banking, insurance and credit systems | 2005 | ||||||
Evolution of Khalasa | 2008 | ||||||
23 | Culture in the Mughal Empire | ||||||
Hindi and other religious literature | 2006 | ||||||
Mughal architecture | 2001 | 2002 | |||||
Mughal painting | 2012 | 2005/07 | 2011 | ||||
Science and technology | 2001 | 2009/10 | |||||
24 | The Eighteenth Century | 2011 | |||||
Factors for the decline of the Mughal Empire | 2005 | ||||||
Maratha ascendancy under the Peshwas | 2012 | 2001 | |||||
The Maratha fiscal and financial system | 2003/04/07 | 2010 | |||||
Emergence of Afghan Power, Battle of Panipat:1761 | 2002 | 2008 |
Modern India
Topic | Sub-topic | Brief Description | 10M | 12 M | 20 Marks | 25M | 30 Marks | 60 Marks |
1 | European Penetration into India | 2013 | 2012 | 2002/6 | 2009 | 2002 | ||
2 | British Expansion in India | 2001/4/5/10 | 2009 | 2006 | ||||
3 | Early Structure of the British Raj | 2004/11 | 2012 | 2005 | ||||
1 | English Utilitarian | 2008/11 | ||||||
4 | Economic Impact of British Colonial Rule | 2013 | 2001/3/4/5/6/9/10 | 2013 | 2001/3/4/6/7 | |||
1 | Famine and poverty in the rural interior | 2003 | 2010 | 2002/5/8 | ||||
2 | Drain of wealth | 2012 | 2010/1/2 | 2008 | ||||
5 | Social and Cultural Developments | 2012 | 2008/11 | 2004 | ||||
6 | Social and Religious Reform movements in Bengal and Other Areas | 2013 | 2005/7/9 | 2013 | 2009/12 | |||
7 | Indian Response to British Rule | 2001 | 2011/12 | |||||
1 | The Great Revolt of 1857 | 2005/7/9/10 | 2011 | |||||
8 | Factors leading to the birth of Indian Nationalism | 2012 | 2010/11 | 2010 | 2001 | |||
1 | National Congress | 2002 | 2013 | 2009 | ||||
2 | the Moderates and Extremists | 2006 | 2003 | |||||
9 | Rise of Gandhi | 2013 | 2002 | |||||
1 | the Khilafat Movement; the Non-cooperation Movement | 2013 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||
2 | beginning of the Civil Disobedience movement | 2005 | ||||||
3 | Quit India Movement; | 2001/3 | 2009 | |||||
4 | The Cabinet Mission | 2004 | ||||||
10 | Constitutional Developments in the Colonial India | 2007 | 2013 | |||||
11 | Other strands of the National Movement | 2010 | ||||||
1 | The Revolutionaries | 2008 | 2003 | |||||
2 | The Left | 2011 | 2013 | 2002/6 | ||||
3 | Subhas Chandra Bose | 2002 | ||||||
12 | Politics of Separatism | 2006/09/10 | 2009 | |||||
13 | Consolidation as a Nation | 2013 | 2011 | |||||
1 | Integration of Princely States | 2007 | ||||||
2 | Nehru’s Foreign Policy | 2012 | 2011 | 2001/04 | ||||
14 | Caste and Ethnicity after 1947 | 2008 | 2010/12 | |||||
15 | Economic development and political change | 2012 |
World History
Topic | Sub-topic | Brief Description | 10 M | 12 M | 20 Marks | 25 M | 30 Marks | 60 Marks |
16 | Enlightenment and Modern ideas | 2012 | ||||||
(i) | Major Ideas of Enlightenment | 2013 | 2004/10 | 2008 | ||||
(ii) | Spread of Enlightenment | |||||||
(iii) | Rise of socialist ideas | 2001/08 | ||||||
17 | Origins of Modern Politics | |||||||
(i) | European States System | |||||||
(ii) | American Revolution and the Constitution. | 2012 | 2006/10 | 2005 | ||||
(iii) | French revolution and after math, 1789-1815. | 2012 | 2002/3/4/5/6/7/10 | 2009/12 | 2001 | |||
(iv) | American Civil War | 2013 | ||||||
(v) | British Democratic Politics, 1815-1850; | 2005/11 | 2013 | 2004 | ||||
18 | Industrialization | 2011 | ||||||
(i) | English Industrial Revolution: | |||||||
(ii) | Industrialization in other countries: | 2012 | 2009 | |||||
(iii) | Industrialization and Globalization. | 2009 | ||||||
19 | Nation-State System | |||||||
(i) | Rise of Nationalism in 19th century | |||||||
(ii) | Nationalism : state-building | 2001/4/5 | 2012 | 2002/03 | ||||
(iii) | Disintegration of Empires | 2001/6 | ||||||
20 | Imperialism and Colonialism | 2013 | 2010 | |||||
(i) | South and South-East Asia | 2010/11 | ||||||
(ii) | Latin America and South Africa | 2009 | 2001 | |||||
(iii) | Australia | |||||||
(iv) | Imperialism and free trade: | 2007 | 2013 | |||||
21 | Revolution and Counter-Revolution : | |||||||
(i) | 19th Century European revolutions | 2008 | ||||||
(ii) | The Russian Revolution of 1917-1921 | 2005 | 2009/12 | 2003 | ||||
(iii) | Fascist Counter-Revolution | 2005 | 2004/07 | |||||
(iv) | The Chinese Revolution of 1949 | 2013 | 2010 | 2012 | 2002/5/6 | |||
22 | World Wars | |||||||
(i) | 1st and 2nd World Wars as Total Wars: | 2007 | ||||||
(ii) | World War I : Causes and Consequences | 2001/3/4/6/11 | 2010/12 | |||||
(iii) | World War II : Causes and consequence | 2002/8/9 | 2010/11 | |||||
23 | The World after World War II: | |||||||
(i) | Emergence of two power blocs | 2008 | 2005 | |||||
(ii) | Emergence of Third World and Non-Alignment | 2010/11 | ||||||
(iii) | UNO and the global disputes | 2003 | 2013 | 2009 | ||||
24 | Liberation from Colonial Rule: | |||||||
(i) |
Latin America-Bolivar |
|||||||
(ii) | Arab World-Egypt | 2009 | 2012 | 2001 | ||||
(iii) | Africa-Apartheid to Democracy |
|
2013 | 2006 | ||||
(iv) | South-East Asia-Vietnam | 2009 | ||||||
25 | Decolonization and Underdevelopment | 2013 | ||||||
(i) | Factors constraining Development : | 2009 | ||||||
26 | Unification of Europe | |||||||
(i) | Post War Foundations : | 2003/7 | ||||||
(ii) | Consolidation of European Community | |||||||
(iii) | European Union. | 2013 | 2011 | |||||
27 | Disintegration of Soviet Union | |||||||
(i) | Collapse of Soviet communism | 2010 | 2013 | 2002/4/7 | ||||
(ii) | Political Changes in Eastern Europe 1989-2001 | 2008 | ||||||
(iii) | End of the Cold War and US Ascendancy | 2012 | 2003/08 |
Above is the analysis of past papers from 2001 onwards. You will be surprised to find that most of the questions are repeated from the last ten year papers for e.g. Indian Feudalism, Bhakti & Sufi Movement. Economic impact of British rule on India is asked record no of times. So that’s the hint.
For preparing mains one has to be focused on relevant areas. Guesswork has to be done to what will come and what will not. (And be mentally prepared to face anything in paper). If you make notes in question-answer format then nothing like that. If you get ready with say 150-200 questions with outline of answers then you can stuck a jackpot. Chronicle Publication has published the book in such format and will prove useful for reference.
It may sound absurd, but NCERT books on History (Class XI & XII), both old and new versions are useful in writing the mains answers. They present the clue about direction and the structure of the answer.
It is very common to say that one has to do writing practice. I repeat it is necessary. Candidates dream that as soon as study is over they will give tests. That’s ideal, seldom has this happened. Studies may never get over. Just make a timetable of tests, follow it strictly, and get it checked from competent authority and discuss them out. Handwriting, speed, fluency and structure of answer play a main role in marks.
One should give full attention to the direction of the question like Discuss, Explain, Evaluate, Describe, Compare etc. Each of them connotes different meaning.
Where ever possible the answer should be substantiated with tables, diagrams and flowcharts.
Group study can do wonders in study of history. Every member in the group can give different insight into the subject. You can shoot questions to each other and comprehend the facts. But make sure that group is no larger than 3-4 friends and all damn serious.
So take a long breath and strings tight in your hand. Now with full vision of future turn your eyes towards past. May goddess of history bless you with success.
Twist in the story continues
The questions are asked in 15,15,20 marks pattern for one question of 50 marks. This way more points could be covered from syllabus and everyone has to cover syllabus in full, or get trapped by being blank in 1 or 2 sub-questions you choose to write.
In modern India long sentences are given to confuse the candidates, many a time it a simple question presented in round format.
Overall we can see that they are targeting a peripheral areas in the history, which are hitherto not asked. For e.g Evaluate the Malfuzat texts sources of media history (10, 2013) Since changing pattern has become pattern of UPSC now, if they do not change it that will be a surprise hereafter. So be mentally ready for the changes.
With regard
Bhushan Deshmukh
No comments:
Post a Comment